In this paper, the signalling subgame in costly verification models is
studied in the context of the investor-entrepreneur contract without
assuming the possibility of commitment to verification. It is shown th
at the game has a unique Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium in mixed strateg
ies, implying that truth-telling and deterministic verification are no
t an equilibrium behavior. When the entire game starting from the stag
e of contract design is considered, it is shown that the contract desi
gned by the informed entrepreneur results in less verification cost th
an the one designed by the uninformed investor. This could be taken as
a normative criterion based upon which institutional arrangements as
regards the distribution of bargaining initiative an to be designed. (
C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.