Through a labor-management partnership, Fort Lauderdale had addressed
a wide variety of service and workplace issues. Presenting a perceptiv
e list of typical barriers to a labor-management partnership, the auth
or exposes us to our own myths and internal obstacles as well as other
difficulties to changing a labor-management relationship. Without min
imizing the difficulties, this article makes it clear that the change
can be made, but the fundamentals must be put in place. There are no c
utting corners, and the partnership must be nurtured. The author makes
us face up to the fact that the union and management have inherently
different values and ways of conducting business and notes that these
differences have to be understood and actually honored. Because labor-
management cooperation will be a revolutionary change in most organiza
tions, leadership on both sides will feel threatened by this shift. As
a result, the author cautions us, it is necessary to pay conscious at
tention, among other things, to managing relationships, actively build
ing trust and deciding where to initiate a labor-management effort. In
a departure from the traditional view of a strict two-party relations
hip, the author points out the importance of alliances with others in
the community who have a direct stake in the outcome of the partnershi
p-or who have a stake in not having it go forward-and the importance o
f institutionalizing the partnership so that it is not just a function
of a few individuals who have built trust. This article focuses serio
us HR professionals, managers and union leaders on what investment it
will take to be successful in pursuing a cooperative labor-management
relationship that produces real change in the service and cost results
of a public agency The presentation is simple and to the point. Parti
es seeking greater detail will find the Fort Lauderdale lessons echoed
and elaborated in Chapter 4 of Working Together, the well-known Repor
t of the Secretary of Labor's Task Force.