LAW FIRMS ON THE BIG BOARD - A PROPOSAL FOR NONLAWYER INVESTMENT IN LAW FIRMS

Citation
Es. Adams et Jh. Matheson, LAW FIRMS ON THE BIG BOARD - A PROPOSAL FOR NONLAWYER INVESTMENT IN LAW FIRMS, California law review, 86(1), 1998, pp. 1-40
Citations number
86
Categorie Soggetti
Law
Journal title
ISSN journal
00081221
Volume
86
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1 - 40
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-1221(1998)86:1<1:LFOTBB>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Every state has a rule proscribing nonlawyer investment in, law firms. This sixty-plus-year-old prohibition has created an inefficient legal services market. Firms cannot access capital markets, limiting their opportunities for expansion, curtailing investments in technology and training, and hindering competition. Furthermore, every jurisdiction e xcept the District of Columbia prohibits lawyers from entering into a business association with nonlawyers as partners or directors if the b usiness provides legal services. These prohibitions against nonlawyer investment and participation in law firms have long hindered the legal profession with no signs of change. This Article advocates that these prohibitions be lifted It discusses the source of these prohibitions and the historical and ethical arguments of critics, which are shown t o be merely phantom concerns. These concerns are far outweighed by the substantial benefits of allowing law firms to incorporate, to engage in business associations with nonlawyers, and to receive investments b y nonlawyers. The benefits include capital for expansion, capital for investment in new technologies and new lawyers, financing for continge ncy fee cases, and a myriad of other rewards. Most persuasively, perha ps, as the practice of law continues to be increasingly transformed fr om a profession into a business, it makes little sense to prevent lawy ers from using the financial tools that virtually every other business has available to it.