Citation: Jm. Skaggs, JUSTIFYING GENDER-BASED AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION UNDER UNITED-STATES V. VIRGINIAS EXCEEDINGLY PERSUASIVE JUSTIFICATION STANDARD, California law review, 86(5), 1998, pp. 1169-1210
Citation: S. Foster, JUSTICE FROM THE GROUND UP - DISTRIBUTIVE INEQUITIES, GRASS-ROOTS RESISTANCE, AND THE TRANSFORMATIVE POLITICS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT, California law review, 86(4), 1998, pp. 775-841
Citation: A. Lovell, OTHER STUDENTS ALWAYS USED TO SAY, LOOK AT THE DYKES - PROTECTING STUDENTS FROM PEER SEXUAL ORIENTATION HARASSMENT, California law review, 86(3), 1998, pp. 617-654
Citation: Jg. Sidak, MONEY FOR NOTHING - POLITICIANS, RENT EXTRACTION, AND POLITICAL EXTORTION - MCCHESNEY,FS, California law review, 86(3), 1998, pp. 655-670
Citation: Es. Adams et Jh. Matheson, LAW FIRMS ON THE BIG BOARD - A PROPOSAL FOR NONLAWYER INVESTMENT IN LAW FIRMS, California law review, 86(1), 1998, pp. 1-40
Citation: S. Anderson, INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY INTERESTS AND THE SPECIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR INVOLUNTARY DRUG AND HIV TESTS, California law review, 86(1), 1998, pp. 119-177