Every person is connected to others through networks composed of famil
y, friends, colleagues, and organizations. No doubt everyone involved
in the field of social work is a part of many networks. Over the years
networks have been described in various ways (Biegel, Tracy, & Corvo,
1994; Dosher, 1976; Rivera & Erlich, 1992; Rubin & Rubin, 1986; Schon
, 1971). For this study a network is described as an organizational in
terconnectedness for associating with others who hold similar interest
s, in order to develop and access ideas, information, support, and oth
er resources that enable network members to improve what they are doin
g (such as provide a better service) or achieve a goal (such as the pr
otection of abused children). Historically, social work has focused on
understanding the nature of social support networks (Biegel, Magazine
r, & Baum, 1991) and community-based interagency networks (Proven & Mi
lward, 1995). There is also a trend for the formation of regional and
national interorganizational human service networks. Despite the proli
feration of networks at all levels of the human service field, a good
deal of what has been written about organizational networks has been a
theoretical, and we know little about their inner workings. The purpos
e of this study was twofold: (1) to identify the organizational charac
teristics of an established regional interorganizational human service
network; and (2) to evaluate the impact of an interorganizational net
work on members and their agencies. Furthermore, a post hoc examinatio
n of the findings suggests that the network under study manifests many
of the characteristics of a learning organization (Senge, 1990). Acco
rding to Senge, a learning organization is ''where people continually
expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where n
ew and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective a
spiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how t
o learn together'' (p. 4). Senge proposes that there are five core dis
ciplines of a learning organization which empowers: (1) personal maste
ry, (2) mental models, (3) shared vision, (4) team building, and (5) s
ystems thinking. The discussion section of the study proposes ways in
which the paradigm of a learning organization can be applied to an int
erorganizational network. Implications of the findings are also presen
ted.