TEACHERS ABILITY TO ESTIMATE ITEM DIFFICULTY - A TEST OF THE ASSUMPTIONS IN THE ANGOFF STANDARD-SETTING METHOD

Citation
Jc. Impara et Bs. Plake, TEACHERS ABILITY TO ESTIMATE ITEM DIFFICULTY - A TEST OF THE ASSUMPTIONS IN THE ANGOFF STANDARD-SETTING METHOD, Journal of educational measurement, 35(1), 1998, pp. 69-81
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Psychologym Experimental","Psychology, Applied","Psychology, Educational
ISSN journal
00220655
Volume
35
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
69 - 81
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0655(1998)35:1<69:TATEID>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The Angoff(1971) standard setting method requires expert panelists to (a) conceptualize candidates who possess the qualifications of interes t (e.g., the minimally qualified) and (b) estimate actual item perform ance for these candidates. Past and current research (Bejar, 1983; She pard, 1994) suggests that estimating item performance is difficult for panelists. if panelists cannot perform this task, the validity of the standard based on these estimates is in question. This study rested t he ability of 26 classroom teachers to estimate item performance for t wo groups of their students on a locally developed district-wide scien ce test. Teachers were more accurate in estimating the performance of the total group than of the ''borderline group,'' but in neither case was their accuracy level high. implications of this finding for the va lidity of item performance estimates by panelists using the Angoff sta ndard setting method are discussed.