Phyto-oestrogens have emerged from their esoteric role in animal husba
ndry following the hypothesis that the human Western diet is relativel
y deficient in these substances compared with societies where large am
ounts of plant foods and legumes are eaten. Evidence is beginning to a
ccrue that they may begin to offer protection against a wide range of
human conditions, including breast, bowel, prostate and other cancers,
cardiovascular disease, brain function, alcohol abuse, osteoporosis a
nd menopausal symptoms. Of the two main classes of these weak oestroge
ns, the isoflavones are under intensive investigation due to their hig
h levels in soyabean. Like the 'anti-oestrogen' Tamoxifen, these seem
to have oestrogenic effects in human subjects in the cardiovascular sy
stem and bone. Although previously only available from food, isoflavon
es are now being marketed in health-food supplements or drinks, and ta
blets may soon be available over the counter as 'natural' hormone-repl
acement therapy. In cancer, antioestrogenic effects are thought to be
important, although genistein especially has been shown to induce wide
-ranging anti-cancer effects in cell lines independent of any hormone-
related influence. There are few indications of harmful effects at pre
sent, although possible proliferative effects have been reported. In i
nfants, the effects of high levels in soya milk formulas are uncertain
. The second group, lignans, have been less investigated despite their
known antioestrogenic effects and more widespread occurrence in foods
. Investigation of the possible benefits of phyto-oestrogens is hamper
ed by lack of analytical standards and, hence, inadequate methods for
the measurement of low levels in most foods. This problem may prove to
be a major dilemma for regulatory authorities, clinicians and others
wishing to advise the general public on whether these compounds really
do have the health benefits attributed to them.