Individuals, groups, and government units have developed considerable
interested in evaluating the social performance of corporations. Evalu
ating corporate social performance (CSP) is important for researchers
investigating the relationship between different organizational measur
es and CSP and for stakeholders employing social performance informati
on in their decision making models. To assess CSP, an aggregate measur
e of CSP which incorporates both an independent assessment of actual p
erformance and the individual value judgements of the stakeholder is n
eeded. In this study, Mle propose a methodology for the development of
a systematic measure of CSP using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Thi
s multi-criteria decision making technique allows for the conversion o
f a multidimensional scale to a unidimensional scale, enabling analysi
s/comparison of companies both within the same industry and across ind
ustries. The technique is illustrated by developing a measure of CSP u
sing several types of managers. The results indicate that there are la
rge rank changes when individual value judgements are incorporated usi
ng relative importance weights.