The need for education in moral values is increasingly being recognise
d today, but how is it to be conducted in schools? In particular we co
nsider the appropriateness or otherwise of a teacher assuming the role
of a neutral chairperson in discussion. Advocacy of such a stance is
especially associated with Lawrence Stenhouse who saw neutrality as a
procedural device in order to empower students' own involvement. We po
int out many of the insights of Stenhouse's approach, but also some of
its disadvantages which subtly encourage a popularist form of relativ
ism. We suggest the substitution of procedural neutrality with a diffe
rent approach, that of critical affirmation. Here the teacher advocate
s a stance alongside everyone else. This, however, is done in a way th
at affirms pupils, and their right to personal views, whilst subjectin
g all views, including the teacher's own, to a close scrutiny, especia
lly regarding implications for the views of others.