Tie paper reports the results of a longitudinal case study conducted i
n Australia and New Zealand. The study compares the reading and compre
hension age of children in their fifth and sixth years in school. Read
ing and comprehension ages of 121 children who had Reading Recovery in
tervention at age 6 were compared with those of a Comparison group of
121 children, drawn from the same classes who, at age 6 years, had bee
n better performers in literacy. Reading and comprehension assessment
was conducted with the use of the Neale Analysis of Reading and analys
ed by means of a t-test. Results show that the mean reading age of ex-
Reading Recovery children was nearly 12 months superior to that of the
Comparison group and that the mean comprehension age was nearly 13 mo
nths superior at very highly significant levels. The results strongly
suggest that Reading Recovery tuition at age 6 years enabled the 121 e
x-Reading Recovery children to make greater progress in literacy than
children in the Comparison group.