Since 1971 there have been a number of studies in which a cut score ha
s been set using a method proposed by Angoff(1971). In this method, ea
ch member of a panel of judges estimates for each test question the pr
oportion correct for a specific target group of examinees. Prior and c
ontemporary research suggests that this is a difficult task for judges
. Angoff also proposed that judges simply indicate whether or not an e
xaminee from the target group will be able to answer each question cor
rectly (the yes/no method). We report on the results of two studies th
at compare a yes/no estimation with a proportion correct estimation. T
he two studies demonstrate that both methods produce essentially equal
cut scores and that judges find the yes/no method more comfortable to
use than the estimated proportion correct method.