This article examines so,ne of the key barriers to collaborative resou
rce management: the differential costs and benefits of these approache
s for organizations and individuals. Drawing on the U.S. Forest Servic
e's use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve f
orest plan appeals in the late 1980s, the analysis shows that although
ADR can benefit the larger organization, the individuals who actually
participate in ADR incur personal costs. The analysis focuses on the
time demands and personal costs of collaborative processes. The articl
e concludes by suggesting changes in organizational policies that can
help mitigate the differential costs and benefits of ADR and reduce so
me of the barriers to more widespread use of collaborative management
approaches by public officials.