Several studies, using analyses that measure the correlation between p
rices in various markets, have argued that deregulation of natural gas
pipeline contracts has reduced the transaction costs between natural
gas markets. Correlations approaches, however, have potentially seriou
s problems. Given these problems, this article estimates transactions
costs directly. Deregulation is found to have lowered transactions cos
ts to and from the Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas regions, but increas
ed transactions costs from the Rocky Mountain area. Deregulation of pi
peline contracts, by lowering the cost of using the market and therefo
re increasing demand for pipeline capacity, may therefore have differe
ntial impacts upon transactions costs between markets. This study impl
ies that the transactions cost approach may be able to overcome severa
l difficulties inherent in the correlations approach.