This paper presents the case against two widespread practices in desig
ning engineering experiments, which are (i) to vary one factor at a ti
me (the OFAT approach) and (ii) to generate experimental points by ran
dom selection (the Monte Carlo approach). These approaches do not prod
uce good experimental designs, defined as generating maximum informati
on per run (IPR), and should be replaced by designs that do. These lat
ter designs (i) vary many factors at a time and (ii) use a patterned s
et of experimental points rather than a random set. An example from ci
rcuit design is used to illustrate this approach. The limitations of t
he random approach are well known amongst statisticians but often not
among engineers. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.