LOW-FIELD BULK DEFECT GENERATION DURING UNIFORM CARRIER INJECTION INTO THE GATE INSULATOR OF INSULATED GATE FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES
Hs. Kim et al., LOW-FIELD BULK DEFECT GENERATION DURING UNIFORM CARRIER INJECTION INTO THE GATE INSULATOR OF INSULATED GATE FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES, Journal of electronic materials, 27(7), 1998, pp. 908-914
Low-field electron injection of up to 10(19) e/cm(2) across the Si-SiO
2 interface into the gate insulator of an n-channel insulated gate fie
ld effect transistor using an optically assisted hot electron injectio
n technique was conducted from room temperature down to 100K. It was f
ound that the room temperature data could be modeled quite accurately
by attributing all of the observed Delta V-t to generation of negative
ly charged defects whose generation follows a power law. At reduced te
mperatures, ''structure'' in the observed data indicated the presence
of one shallow first order trap. In this case, a combination of a powe
r law generation term and a single first order trap cross section was
used, and is needed, to accurately model the data. It was also found t
hat trap generation is enhanced significantly as the temperature is re
duced. Threshold voltage shifts were shown by charge pumping measureme
nts not to be associated with interface state generation under the low
-field conditions employed. The results presented here indicate that e
ven at very low applied oxide fields (1 MV/cm) hot electron injection
not only results in the filling of existing traps, but also in the gen
eration of new charged bulk defects whose generation rate increases as
the temperature is reduced, or the injection current density is incre
ased. These results also raise questions about some of the reports of
small cross section trapping centers less than or equal to 10(-17) cm(
2), since these were typically characterized by applying a only first
order trapping model to high field and/or high current density injecti
on data. Such aggressive injection conditions could very easily have r
esulted in the generation of charged bulk defects which could then be
erroneously identified as one or more small cross section traps.