Jn. Giamalva et al., DIETITIANS EMPLOYED BY HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES PREFERRED A HACCP SYSTEM OVER IRRADIATION OR CHEMICAL RINSES FOR REDUCING RISK OF FOODBORNE DISEASE, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(8), 1998, pp. 885-888
Objective To survey dietitians in health care facilities about the acc
eptability of alternative meat and poultry processing methods designed
to reduce the risk of foodborne disease and their willingness to pay
for these processes. Subjects A geographically representative sample o
f 600 members of The American Dietetic Association who work in health
care facilities. The response rate was 250 completed questionnaires fr
om 592 eligible subjects (42%). Design A mail survey was used to gathe
r information on the acceptability of a Hazard Analysis and Critical C
ontrol Point (HACCP) system, chemical rinses, and irradiation for incr
easing the safety of food. Discrete choice contingent valuation was us
ed to determine the acceptability at current prices and at 5, 10, and
25 cents per pound above current prices. Statistical analyses Logistic
regression was used to estimate mean willingness to pay (the maximum
amount respondents are willing to pay) for each process. A simultaneou
s equations regression model was used to estimate the effects of other
variables on acceptability. Results Respondents expressed a high leve
l of concern for food safety in health care facilities. The estimated
mean willingness to pay was highest for a HACCP system and lowest for
chemical rinses. Conclusions/applications The successful adoption of a
lternative methods to increase food safety depends on their acceptance
by foodservice professionals. The professionals sampled were most acc
epting of a HACCP system, somewhat less accepting of irradiation, and
least accepting of new chemical rinses. Poultry and beef processors an
d government agencies concerned with food safety may want to take into
account the attitudes of foodservice professionals.