We consider the problem of filling n positions from a pool of N applic
ants. We assume that there exists an objective measure of each applica
nt's ability-the applicant's ''score.'' Letting Q be the mean score of
the n accepted applicants, we study the difference in Q as the N appl
icants are stratified into It subsets, a certain number of the n accep
ted applicants necessarily coming from each subset. Clearly, any accep
ted group other than the top n out of N will result in a lower Q. We c
onsider how the decrease in average score, Q, varies with various para
meters and proportion allocations. There is no question that the issue
of segmented selection (essentially, quota systems) can be controvers
ial. Many argue for and many argue against using segmented selection,
under such names as veteran's preference, affirmative action, and othe
rs. We take no ''stand'' on this controversy. We consider solely this
one statistical/quantitative aspect of the segmented selection/quota s
ystem question. We believe that the results contained herein provide a
useful backdrop under which the controversial aspects of the issue ca
n be discussed.