Two randomly assigned groups of introductory Psychology students recei
ved different but comparable presentations of the same sample multiple
-choice final exam. The practice-exam group took a test on the questio
ns and immediately afterward scored their tests according to the key (
i.e., questions and answers), whereas the review-exam group saw only t
he key and performed a control task concurrently. On a final exam give
n I week later, the practice-exam students scored significantly higher
than the review-exam group. In addition, they rated their task as mor
e helpful in preparing them for the final. These effects did not inter
act with students' class standing. Apparently, students at all levels
of academic ability benefit from an objective assessment of their prep
aration for a final exam.