BACTERIAL PROFILE OF GROUND-BEEF MADE FROM CARCASS TISSUE EXPERIMENTALLY CONTAMINATED WITH PATHOGENIC AND SPOILAGE BACTERIA BEFORE BEING WASHED WITH HOT-WATER, ALKALINE-SOLUTION, OR ORGANIC-ACID AND THEN STORED AT 4 OR 12-DEGREES-C
Wj. Dorsa et al., BACTERIAL PROFILE OF GROUND-BEEF MADE FROM CARCASS TISSUE EXPERIMENTALLY CONTAMINATED WITH PATHOGENIC AND SPOILAGE BACTERIA BEFORE BEING WASHED WITH HOT-WATER, ALKALINE-SOLUTION, OR ORGANIC-ACID AND THEN STORED AT 4 OR 12-DEGREES-C, Journal of food protection, 61(9), 1998, pp. 1109-1118
The long-term effectiveness of several beef-carcass surface-tissue (BC
T) wash interventions on the microbiology of ground beef produced from
this tissue was determined. BCT was inoculated with bovine feces cont
aining one of two different levels (ca. 4 or 6 log CFU/ml) of Escheric
hia coli O157:H7, Listeria innocua, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostr
idium sporogenes. The BCT was then subjected to one of several treatme
nt washes: 2% (vol/vol) DL-lactic acid (LA), 2% (vol/vol) acetic acid
(AA), 12% (wt/vol) trisodium phosphate (TSP), hot water (HW; 74 +/- 2
degrees C at the tissue surface), or water (WW; 32 +/- 2 degrees 0 at
the tissue surface). A control group was left untreated. After treatme
nts, BCT was held at 4 degrees C for 24 h and then ground. The ground
beef was packaged and incubated at 4 degrees 0. for 21 days or 12 degr
ees C for 3 days. AA-treated samples held at 12 degrees C for 3 days y
ielded significantly lower aerobic plate counts than the control and a
lso yielded the lowest levels of pseudomonads when compared to other s
ample groups. After being held at 4 degrees C for 21 days or 12 degree
s C for 3 days, samples treated with antimicrobial compounds had lower
or no detectable (<1 CFU/g) levels of E. coli O157:H7, L. innocua, S.
typhimurium, and C. sporogenes than beef treated with a WW or the con
trol. Ground beef produced from tissue treated with HW yielded lower p
opulations of these bacteria when compared to WW or untreated control
beef, but the populations were generally higher than those observed in
any of the antimicrobial chemical-treated samples. These trends conti
nued throughout all storage conditions over time. Results from this st
udy indicate that the use of carcass interventions, especially antimic
robial compounds, presently available to the slaughter industry will l
ower bacterial counts in ground beef.