In this article four anxieties expressed by Peter Gardner about our co
nception of open-mindedness and its educational implications are exami
ned. It is argued that none of Gardner's anxieties undermine our view
that open-mindedness requires neither neutrality nor indecision with r
espect to a matter in question, bur rather that open-mindedness is com
patible with holding of beliefs and commitments about such matters pro
vided that the beliefs and commitments are formed and held in such a w
ay that they are open to revision in the light of evidence and argumen
t.