This article takes on the difficult task of frying to ascertain the pr
acticality of discourse as a means toward establishing a more democrat
ic public administration. Of concern are the methods currently used to
evaluate the authenticity of such endeavors, particularly Fox and Mil
ler's warrants for discourse, which have something of a reliability pr
oblem. This particular work suggests the use of more systematic ways t
o examine discursive behavior; either in lieu of or in conjunction wit
h the warrants. These are called empirical referents, and are inclusio
n, self-regulation, and policy outputs. Use of these empirical referen
ts is intended to help provide us with a clearer focus for our discour
se about the process of policy implementation and the attainment of te
nable results.