Despite both resistance from the dominant orthodoxy and complications
caused by the competing claims of new paradigm diversity, there is a p
ressing need for TESOL researchers to engage productively with the ric
hness of intellectual opportunity currently available in the human sci
ences. There are three possible avenues of growth: to extend conventio
nal research parameters; to align one's work with a recognized radical
alternative; to develop an individual stance. Any effective response
must address questions of position (the research tradition in terms of
which one wishes to be evaluated), voice (in terms of who is given sp
ace to speak) and representation (the farm of discourse chosen). Taken
together, these form the basis of legitimization tin terms of disputa
ble argument) and authentication tin terms of contextualized credibili
ty). They are, therefore, fundamental to the provision of adequate war
rant for the research in which TESOL needs to be involved. This questi
on of what constitutes a warrant is the central issue.