Four experiments explored the effects of warnings on people's allocati
on of responsibility for product safety. Participants read description
s of accident scenarios in which injuries occurred during the use of p
roducts. They then allocated responsibility to the manufacturer, retai
ler, or consumer (user). Results of two experiments indicated more res
ponsibility was assigned to the consumer and less to the manufacturer
when products were accompanied by a warning (76%-94% to the consumer),
compared to a no-warning condition (41%-68%). A third experiment comp
ared responsibility allocations for good versus poor warnings. Consume
rs were assigned more responsibility (83%) with good warnings than wit
h poor warnings (69%). The fourth experiment again showed warnings pla
yed a significant role in the allocations, but injury severity did not
. Interactions in all four experiments indicated the role of warnings
in responsibility allocations was less for products where the hazards
are more obvious. In addition to implications for product safety, the
results provide insights into jury decision making regarding the role
of warnings in product liability litigation. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Son
s, Inc.