ASSESSING PARTITIONING SCHEDULING STORAGE TRADE-OFFS FOR REGULAR ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS

Citation
M. Anderson et F. Berman, ASSESSING PARTITIONING SCHEDULING STORAGE TRADE-OFFS FOR REGULAR ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS, Integration, 15(1), 1993, pp. 25-50
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
System Science","Computer Sciences","Computer Applications & Cybernetics
Journal title
ISSN journal
01679260
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
25 - 50
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-9260(1993)15:1<25:APSSTF>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The problem of partitioning systolic algorithms (a subclass of Regular Iterative Algorithms (RIA)) has been studied by a number of researche rs. One approach to partitioning the algorithm is to divide the index space into equivalence classes called blocks. The blocks are scheduled and placed on a processor array of a fixed size. This approach create s the need for auxiliary memory structures to store partial results an d the need for control circuitry to direct the resulting non-uniform f low of data values within the array. The implementation of these struc tures and the means of comparing the cost of differences in the struct ures resulting from various partitioning and scheduling policies has b een largely omitted in the literature. In this paper we offer a detail ed model of Fixed Size Array Processor architectures. Using this model we may assess the trade-offs between auxiliary memory structure size, execution time, and control circuit complexity. The control circuits generate signals which determine the data flow through the array. We e mphasize methods for controlling non-uniform data flow resulting from some partitionings of the index space. We show how to derive the contr ol signals in such arrays from the determination of the index points. We also show how the translation of index points to control signals ca n be refined by a process of index pipelining which reduces the comple xity of the control circuitry. Several partitioning and scheduling sch emes for QR decomposition are evaluated to illustrate how the model ma y be used to determine a good partitioning/scheduling/storage configur ation.