LITERACY AND BODY FATNESS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH UNDERREPORTING OF ENERGY-INTAKE IN US LOW-INCOME WOMEN USING THE MULTIPLE-PASS 24-HOUR RECALL- A DOUBLY LABELED WATER STUDY
Rk. Johnson et al., LITERACY AND BODY FATNESS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH UNDERREPORTING OF ENERGY-INTAKE IN US LOW-INCOME WOMEN USING THE MULTIPLE-PASS 24-HOUR RECALL- A DOUBLY LABELED WATER STUDY, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(10), 1998, pp. 1136-1140
Objective The accuracy of the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method for
estimating energy intake in low-income women in the United States was
ascertained by comparing the method with measurements of total energy
expenditure. The multiple-pass 24-hour recall is designed to provide r
espondents with multiple cues and opportunities to report their food i
ntake. It consists of 3 distinct passes: the quick list, detailed desc
ription, and review. Predictors of energy intake misreporting (energy
intake - total energy expenditure) in the sample were determined. Desi
gn Four multiple-pass 24-hour recalls (2 in person, 2 by telephone) we
re obtained over a 14-day period to estimate energy intake. Total ener
gy expenditure was measured over the same 14-day period using the doub
ly labeled water method. Body composition was measured using dual ener
gy x-rag absorptiometry: and Literacy was measured by the Wide Range A
chievement Test (WRAT) for reading and spelling. Subjects/settings Thi
rty-five low-income women between the ages of 19 and 46 years mere tes
ted at the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Vermo
nt, Burlington. Low income was defined as a household income at or bel
ow 130% of the federal poverty level. Statistical analysis Pearson pro
duct moment correlation coefficients, t tests, paired t tests, and ste
pwise multiple regression analysis were used to test the relationships
among study variables. Results Mean energy intake was significantly l
ower than mean total energy expenditure (2,197+/-607 vs 2,644+/-503 kc
al, P=.001) and the correlation between the 2 measures was poor (r=.22
, P=.20). Percentage body fat and the combined age-adjusted reading an
d spelling WRAT scores were the best predictors of misreporting of ene
rgy intake (R=.52, P=.006). Conclusions The multiple-pass 24-hour reca
ll did not generate a group measure of energy intake that was accurate
or unbiased in this sample. Underreporting was strongly associated wi
th increased body fatness. The ai;ability to read and spell as measure
d by the WRAT improved the accuracy of the women's recall of their foo
d intake. Applications Dietetics professionals should take into consid
eration the problem of underreporting whenever conclusions are made ab
out associations between diet and health and/or when evaluating the im
pact of food assistance programs on dietary intake.