Foundations and government agencies use community coalitions increasin
gly as instruments of social policy and program implementation. The ra
tionales and hopes for community coalitions abound with terms such as
grassroots, representation, development, and empowerment. This article
examines the range and relationship of the conceptual meanings of the
se terms to explain their consequences on community coalition building
. It arranges their differences in conceptual patterns and suggests th
at community coalitions have their greatest chance of success when the
ir member groups share the same forms of representation and participat
ion and pursue similar forms of empowerment and change. This discussio
n clarifies the different policy and program purposes that different c
ommunity coalitions may serve. Thus, the article explains the difficul
ties with broad coalitions and may assist to make some community coali
tion building easier and to make all community coalitions more effecti
ve.