E. Early et al., THE 1996 NORTH-AMERICAN INTERAGENCY INTERCOMPARISON OF ULTRAVIOLET MONITORING SPECTRORADIOMETERS, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 103(5), 1998, pp. 449-482
Concern over stratospheric ozone depletion has prompted several govern
ment agencies in North America to establish networks of spectroradiome
ters for monitoring solar ultraviolet irradiance at the surface of the
Earth. To assess the ability of spectroradiometers to accurately meas
ure solar ultraviolet irradiance, and to compare the results between i
nstruments of different monitoring networks, the third North American
Interagency Intercomparison of Ultraviolet Monitoring Spectroradiomete
rs was held June 17-25, 1996 at Table Mountain outside Boulder, Colora
do, USA. This Intercomparison was coordinated by the National Institut
e of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Oceanic and Atmo
spheric Administration (NOAA). Participating agencies were the Environ
mental Protection Agency; the National Science Foundation; the Smithso
nian Environmental Research Center; the Department of Agriculture; and
the Atmospheric Environment Service, Canada. The spectral irradiances
of participants' calibrated standard lamps were measured at NIST prio
r to the Intercomparison. The spectral irradiance scales used by the p
articipants agreed with the NIST scale within the combined uncertainti
es, and for all lamps the spectral irradiance in the horizontal positi
on was lower than that in the vertical position. Instruments were char
acterized for wavelength uncertainty, bandwidth, stray-light rejection
, and spectral irradiance responsivity, the latter with NIST standard
lamps operating in specially designed field calibration units. The spe
ctral irradiance responsivity demonstrated instabilities for some inst
ruments. Synchronized spectral scans of the solar irradiance were perf
ormed over several days. Using the spectral irradiance responsivities
determined with the NIST standard lamps, the measured solar irradiance
s had some unexplained systematic differences between instruments.