The widespread use of polygraph (''lie detector'') tests has important
social and individual consequences. Courts asked to admit polygraph f
indings into evidence, as well as individuals asked to submit to polyg
raph tests, have a natural interest in the acceptance by the relevant
scientific community of the polygraph technique. For this reason, we c
onducted mail surveys to obtain the opinions of 2 groups of scientists
from relevant disciplines: members of the Society for Psychophysiolog
ical Research and Fellows of the American Psychological Association's
Division 1 (General Psychology). Survey return rates were high (91% an
d 74%, respectively). Most of the respondents believed that polygraphi
c lie detection is not theoretically sound, claims of high validity fo
r these procedures cannot be sustained, the Lie test can be beaten by
easily learned countermeasures, and polygraph test results should not
be admitted into evidence in courts of law.