THE VALIDITY OF THE LIE-DETECTOR - 2 SURVEYS OF SCIENTIFIC OPINION

Citation
Wg. Iacono et Dt. Lykken, THE VALIDITY OF THE LIE-DETECTOR - 2 SURVEYS OF SCIENTIFIC OPINION, Journal of applied psychology, 82(3), 1997, pp. 426-433
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Applied
ISSN journal
00219010
Volume
82
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
426 - 433
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9010(1997)82:3<426:TVOTL->2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The widespread use of polygraph (''lie detector'') tests has important social and individual consequences. Courts asked to admit polygraph f indings into evidence, as well as individuals asked to submit to polyg raph tests, have a natural interest in the acceptance by the relevant scientific community of the polygraph technique. For this reason, we c onducted mail surveys to obtain the opinions of 2 groups of scientists from relevant disciplines: members of the Society for Psychophysiolog ical Research and Fellows of the American Psychological Association's Division 1 (General Psychology). Survey return rates were high (91% an d 74%, respectively). Most of the respondents believed that polygraphi c lie detection is not theoretically sound, claims of high validity fo r these procedures cannot be sustained, the Lie test can be beaten by easily learned countermeasures, and polygraph test results should not be admitted into evidence in courts of law.