L. Johansson et al., RESPONSE RATES WITH DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTION METHODS AND REWARD, AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF A QUANTITATIVE FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE, European journal of clinical nutrition, 51(6), 1997, pp. 346-353
Objectives: To evaluate the use of a self-administered quantitative fo
od frequency questionnaire (QFFQ) ina national dietary survey concerni
ng (a) response rates with different distribution methods and reward;
(b) degree of underreporting of energy intake; (c) reproducibility of
the QFFQ; and (d) seasonal variation on reported intake. Design and su
bjects: A pilot study was performed in 1992 to test response rates to
the QFFQ with three different distribution methods, with and without r
eward, in a random sample of 1200 adults aged 16-79 y. Zn another stud
y, the QFFQ was distributed to a nation-wide, representative random sa
mple of 5008 adults aged 16-79 y duping June, September, November 1993
and March 1994. Reproducibility was evaluated among 90 responders to
the survey who answered another QFFQ six weeks later. Results: The dis
tribution method combining postal distribution and collecting the QFFQ
by interviewer as well as an offer to participate in a lottery, gave
the highest response rate (72%). The possibility to get a reward incre
ased the response rate by 9, 14 and 57%, respectively, depending on th
e distribution method used. The mean daily energy intake and the perce
ntage of subjects claiming to have unlikely low energy intake did not
differ significantly between the different ways of distribution In the
main survey the mean ratio between energy intake and estimated basal
metabolic rate was 1.58 among men and 1.47 among women, and 37% of men
and 45% of women had a ratio below 1.35. Spearman rank correlations b
etween the two QFFQ ranged from 0.48 (edible fats) to 0.91 (coffee) wi
th a median coefficient of 0.70. For nutrients correlations ranged fro
m 0.55 (carbohydrate E%) to 0.81 (alcohol), with a median coefficient
of 0.72. The season of questionnaire administration was of minor impor
tance for the reported intake of the main foods and nutrients. Conclus
ions: The QFFQ-method is suitable for use in a Norwegian nutritional s
urveillance system.