Mp. Seah, SURFACE CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS - COMPARING AND EXCHANGING DATA, Journal of vacuum science & technology. A. Vacuum, surfaces, and films, 15(3), 1997, pp. 485-492
Citations number
66
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Applied","Materials Science, Coatings & Films
The current status of repeatability and reproducibility in interlabora
tory studies in surface analysis using Auger electron spectroscopy (AE
S), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), dynamic and static seconda
ry ion mass spectrometries (SIMS), and sputtering are briefly reviewed
. Repeatabilities are governed by the quality of the instrument design
and the procedure for instrument use. Reproducibility from laboratory
to laboratory requires the use of transfer standards which may be tec
hnique wide, as in the cases of AES and XPS, or sample specific as in
the case of dynamic SIMS. Repeatabilities of intensity ratios with goo
d instruments and procedures should be better than 2% for all techniqu
es for suitable samples. Repeatabilities of the energy scale in good e
lectron spectrometers average around 0.025 eV. The reproducibilities i
n quantification have improved to around 10% relative standard deviati
on, The measurement infrastructure is developing well and it needs to
be reinforced by the relevant documentary standards to enable analysts
to transfer and exchange data, at the above levels, and to improve it
where necessary. The analyst needs methods of validating both equipme
nt and software and the laboratory management, in rum, needs methods o
f testing the analyst's proficiency. These aspects need development of
appropriate documentary standards, as pioneered by ASTM Committee E-4
2 on Surface Analysis and, at an international level, by the Internati
onal Standards Organization Technical Committee 201 on Surface Chemica
l Analysis, (C) 1997 American Vacuum Society.