I. Hosenfeld et al., GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL ABILITY TAS KS - A QUESTION OF STRATEGY, Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 11(2), 1997, pp. 85-94
This study deals with the relationship between the often reported gend
er difference (i.e., males outperform females) in spatial ability and
the choice of strategy. Two strategies are taken into account: A holis
tical strategy in which the stimulus is transformed mentally as a whol
e, and an analytical approach which concentrates on the comparison of
details of the stimulus (cf. Cooper 1976). Our investigation was carri
ed out to test whether males' higher spatial ability scores are due to
choosing the superior (holistical) strategy, or the greater effective
ness in applying the superior strategy or whether both factors contrib
ute to the effect. Data from n = 403 students on the cubes-subscale fr
om the IST (Amthauer 1953) were analyzed by means of the mixed-Rasch-m
odel (J. Rost 1990). As expected, two latent classes applying differen
t strategies (holistical vs. analytical) were identified. Moreover, re
sults indicate that male superiority in spatial ability is explained b
y the greater effectiveness in applying the superior strategy.