EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE - FROM BACONIAN INDUCTIVE ASCENT TO THE IRRELEVANCE OF SCIENTIFIC LAWS

Authors
Citation
R. Blanco et M. Niaz, EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE - FROM BACONIAN INDUCTIVE ASCENT TO THE IRRELEVANCE OF SCIENTIFIC LAWS, Instructional science, 25(3), 1997, pp. 203-231
Citations number
70
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Education & Educational Research
Journal title
ISSN journal
00204277
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
203 - 231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-4277(1997)25:3<203:EBOSAT>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The main objectives of this study are to: (a) to investigate students' and teachers' beliefs about the nature of science; (b) to explore the relationship among the students' and teachers' beliefs; and (c) to ca rry out a rational reconstruction of students' and teachers' beliefs b ased on a Lakatosian perspective of the history and philosophy of scie nce. Eighty-nine freshman students and 7 chemistry teachers at the Ins titute Universitario de Tecnologia, El Tigre (Venezuela) were asked to respond to a 4-item questionnaire. Students' and teachers' responses were classified as positivist, transitional or Lakatosian. Most of the students and teachers responded with a very similar positivist approa ch. Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers in this study can be summarized as follows: a scientific theory has not been proved in its totality, whereas a scientific law has not only been proved, but i s also universal, and furthermore, a theory tells us about more comple x and explicit things. In view of the Lakatosian interpretation that t he conflict is not between theories and laws, but rather between an in terpretative and an explanatory theory, it is concluded that science t eachers reconsider the dichotomous presentation of scientific progress found in most text books, in terms of theories and laws.