Kr. Sarma et al., EPITAXY VERSUS ORIENTED HETEROGENEOUS NUCLEATION OF ORGANIC-CRYSTALS ON IONIC SUBSTRATES, Journal of crystal growth, 174(1-4), 1997, pp. 487-494
It is plausible to assume that epitaxy is a special case of heterogene
ous nucleation in which a restrictive crystallographic relationship ex
ists between substrate and deposit orientations. This would mean that
epitaxial substrates should always induce a perceptible reduction in t
he critical supercooling for nucleation of the deposit. To test this h
ypothesis, the critical supercoolings of six organic compounds were me
asured on glass and 11 single-crystal cleaved substrates including (00
01) graphite, (001) mica, (111) BaF2, SrF2, and CaF2, and (100) KCl, K
Br, KI, NaCl, NaF, and LIF. Reductions in supercooling (with reference
to glass substrates) were checked many limes for repeatability and re
producibility and shown in almost all cases to have a standard deviati
on of 1 degrees C or less. Acetanilide, benzoic acid, and p-bromochlor
obenzene showed a wide range of supercooling reductions and were orien
ted on all crystalline substrates. Naphthalene and p-dibromobenzene sh
owed only slight supercooling reductions but were oriented on all subs
trates, including glass. Benzil showed strong supercooling reductions
only for mica and KI but was oriented not only in these cases but also
with KI, BaF2, CaF2, and graphite. There was little correlation betwe
en degree of lattice match and either supercooling reduction or degree
of preferred orientation. These results suggest that, for the systems
and geometry studied, forces such as molecular dipole binding and gro
wth anisotropy had a stronger effect than lattice match.