REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY IN THE EVALUATION OF DECISION OUTCOMES

Citation
T. Connolly et al., REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY IN THE EVALUATION OF DECISION OUTCOMES, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 70(1), 1997, pp. 73-85
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Applied",Management,"Psychology, Social
ISSN journal
07495978
Volume
70
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
73 - 85
Database
ISI
SICI code
0749-5978(1997)70:1<73:RARITE>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The negative affect associated with bad decision outcomes is often tho ught to involve feelings of remorse or self-blame. For example, studie s showing greater regret associated with active than with passive choi ce are interpreted as the active chooser piling self-recrimination on top the disappointment of a poor outcome. Corresponding rejoicing is p ostulated for active choice that leads to good outcomes. The five expe riments reported here challenge such a view. In each, hypothetical ind ividuals experienced identical gains or losses, some as a result of th eir own choice, others as a result of an external, arbitrary process. Though evaluations of final outcomes were heavily influenced by the pa ths by which the outcomes were reached, and by the comparison levels t hat were evoked, in no case was decision agency a significant influenc e. In these experiments, then, the ''active chooser'' effect appears m ore a matter of change than of choice, of the route taken rather than whether one is the driver or the passenger. Further research will be n eeded to establish the circumstances under which different salient com parisons are evoked. (C) 1997 Academic Press.