N. Guppy et Ab. Arai, TEACHING SOCIOLOGY - COMPARING UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULA IN THE UNITED-STATES AND IN ENGLISH CANADA, Teaching sociology, 22(3), 1994, pp. 217-230
On the basis of theoretical arguments from the sociology of sociology
and the sociology of knowledge, we explore how sociologists have const
ructed the undergraduate curriculum. Focusing on sociological theory a
nd research methods, we use survey data from departments and instructo
rs in the United States and in English Canada. In addition to comparin
g the degree of fragmentation versus unification that exists in underg
raduate curricula, we explore six specific questions: the relative imp
ortance of theory versus methods in teaching; the proportionate emphas
is of quantitative methods teaching; the emphasis on classical versus
contemporary theory; the extent of integration of theory with methods;
the relation between theory/methods teaching and substantive courses;
and the stress on sociology versus other courses in the undergraduate
BA program. We find that the English Canadian curriculum is more Euro
pean in flavor; it places relatively greater emphasis on sociological
theory, especially classical training. In contrast, U.S. schools empha
size research methods in the context of a more liberal arts program.