In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of combined logic and I-DD
Q testing to detect stuck-at and bridging faults. The stuck-at faults
are detected by the logic test and I-DDQ testing detects bridging faul
ts. Near minimal stuck-at test sets are used for this combined logic a
nd I(DDQ)nvironment. These near minimal stuck-at test sets are generat
ed using standard test programs, while using collapsed fault lists. We
examined ISCAS '85 and ISCAS '89 benchmark circuits under this combin
ed test environment. A comparison is given for the fault coverage obta
ined under this combined test environment with other studies based on
pure logic test and I-DDQ test. Also, the results of I-DDQ based test
sets (vectors generated specifically for I-DDQ testing) are compared w
ith that of stuck-at test sets. Finally, we present a case study on a
microprogrammed processor using a functional test set to detect bridgi
ng faults in I-DDQ testing.