BEYOND G - THE IMPACT OF GF-GC SPECIFIC COGNITIVE-ABILITIES RESEARCH ON THE FUTURE USE AND INTERPRETATION OF INTELLIGENCE-TESTS IN THE SCHOOLS

Citation
Ks. Mcgrew et al., BEYOND G - THE IMPACT OF GF-GC SPECIFIC COGNITIVE-ABILITIES RESEARCH ON THE FUTURE USE AND INTERPRETATION OF INTELLIGENCE-TESTS IN THE SCHOOLS, School psychology review, 26(2), 1997, pp. 189-210
Citations number
77
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational
Journal title
ISSN journal
02796015
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
189 - 210
Database
ISI
SICI code
0279-6015(1997)26:2<189:BG-TIO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
This article describes recent developments in intelligence theory, app lied measurement, and research methodology that suggest that new resea rch is needed to reexamine the relative importance of both general and specific cognitive abilities in explaining school achievement. A summ ary of the results of a set of studies which examined the relationship between g and seven Gf-Ge specific abilities and general and specific reading and mathematics skills, is presented. These studies were desi gned to reexamine the g versus specific abilities issue in a manner th at reflects progress in theory, measurement, and methodology. Analyses were conducted in separate model calibration and cross-validation sam ples (n = 222 to 255) at each of five grade levels (i.e., grades 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, and 10-12). These studies used structural equation mode ling procedures and tests from a validated Gf-Ge organized intelligenc e battery to operationalize a hierarchical g + Gf-Gc model consistent with Carroll's (1993) three stratum model of intelligence. Across all analyses, the relationship of g to general reading and math was as exp ected - significant and strong across all developmental levels. Howeve r, a number of significant and strong cross-validated direct effects f or specific Gf-Ge abilities on specific reading and math skills also w ere found. The results of these studies suggest that (a) some specific abilities, including auditory processing, and fluid and crystallized intelligence, may be important for understanding the development of sp ecific reading and math skills, above and beyond the understanding gai ned from general cognitive (g) and achievement constructs; (b) the pre dominate ''Just say no'' to subtest analysis position presented in muc h of the school psychology literature may need to be reevaluated; and (c) practitioners need to broaden their assessments beyond traditional instruments (e.g., Wechsler, 1991), in order to measure specific cogn itive abilities that maybe important in the development of specific re ading and math skills.