I present argument and evidence for a structural ecology of social cap
ital that describes how the value of social capital to an individual i
s contingent on the number of people doing the same work. The informat
ion and control benefits of bridging the structural holes-or, disconne
ctions between nonredundant contacts in a network-that constitute soci
al capital are especially valuable to managers with few peers. Such ma
nagers do not have the guiding frame of reference for behavior provide
d by numerous competitors, and the work they do does not have the legi
timacy provided by numerous people doing the same kind of work. I use
network and performance data on a probability sample of senior manager
s to show how the value of social capital, high on average for the man
agers, varies as a power function of the number of people doing the sa
me work.(.)