In this article, we focus on the instructional explanation of guessing
as a heuristic for solving the Five Planes Problem (FPP), given in a
lesson by George Polya. We use the analysis of the lesson to test the
applicability of what is known about instructional explanations in ele
mentary mathematics to higher mathematics. The most salient characteri
stic of Polya's lesson is the profusion of models and representations
used to develop a sense of the problem and to support the instructiona
l explanation. Polya used analogical models to transform the complex P
PP to a simpler one, and he used representations to extend the perspec
tive on the problem. Introducing such models and representations requi
res keeping track of the links between them and the original problem.
Polya excelled in this endeavor, and his passage to each new represent
ation or model was generally justified in terms of the goals of the ex
planation. Another very important feature of an instructional explanat
ion is problem identification, a fragile goal state that needs to be c
onstantly maintained when the problem being explained is complex. For
this lesson, we examine how Polya established and maintained that goat
. Finally, we offer some insight on instructional explanations in a si
tuation in which the teacher needs to fulfill two goals at the same ti
me. Here, the first goal was to teach students both how to solve FPP a
nd how to use guessing as a problem-solving heuristic or strategy; the
second goal was to show us how to teach guessing. Keeping these goals
in mind, we offer some suggestions on how to teach metaskills through
mathematical problems in accordance with the current understanding of
constructivist approaches to learning.