Governments of Australia have, at least since the 1960s, desired the c
ontrol of tertiary education. From the mid-1960s to 1988 Australia had
a binary system of higher education comprised of universities and col
leges of advanced education. The latter were subject to much stricter
government regulation. One of the main intentions was to have a system
of tertiary education which was more attuned to the economic needs of
the nation and less expensive than traditional universities. Colleges
of advanced education were supposed to be 'equal bur different'. Hist
orians of education have been criticised for concentrating on facts an
d acts and for ignoring the human and social dimensions of institution
al history. This paper redresses some of these shortcomings. The paper
focuses on the individual working lives of a group of academic staff
in one of Australia's oldest colleges of advanced education. It examin
es the influence of government regulations at the individual level. Th
e paper investigates how system-wide restraints were reflected in the
institutions they were supposed to influence. The issues covered inclu
de academic recruitment, induction programmes, institutional history t
he use of sanctions and rewards and controls on teaching.