HOW RELIABLE ARE TOEFL SCORES

Citation
H. Wainer et R. Lukhele, HOW RELIABLE ARE TOEFL SCORES, Educational and psychological measurement, 57(5), 1997, pp. 741-758
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Psychologym Experimental","Mathematical, Methods, Social Sciences","Mathematics, Miscellaneous
ISSN journal
00131644
Volume
57
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
741 - 758
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-1644(1997)57:5<741:HRATS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The reliability of scores on four forms of the Test of English as a Fo reign Language (TOEFL) was estimated using a hybrid IRT model. It was found that there was very little difference between their overall reli ability when the testlet items were assumed to be independent and when their dependence was modeled. A larger difference in reliability was found when test sections were analyzed individually. Then we found as much as a 40% overestimate in reading comprehension testlets, with the longer testlets of the newest form of TOEFL showing the most local de pendence. The listening comprehension testlets exhibited much less loc al dependence. We also found that the test was unidimensional enough f or the use of univariate item response theory (IRT) to be efficacious, and that the reading comprehension testlets showed essentially no dif ferential functioning by sex.