Citation: Tm. Honess et al., JUROR COMPETENCE IN PROCESSING COMPLEX INFORMATION - IMPLICATIONS FROM A SIMULATION OF THE MAXWELL TRIAL, Criminal law review, 1998, pp. 763-773
Citation: D. Sunman, ADVANCING DISCLOSURE - CAN THE RULES FOR ADVANCE INFORMATION IN THE MAGISTRATES COURTS BE IMPROVED, Criminal law review, 1998, pp. 798-801
Citation: S. Thompson, DEFENSE STATEMENTS - WEIGHTING THE SCALES OR TIPPING THE BALANCE ON ASUBMISSION OF NO CASE, Criminal law review, 1998, pp. 802-807
Citation: P. Roberts, ALL THE USUAL SUSPECTS - A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER NO-141 (PG 75, 1997), Criminal law review, 1997, pp. 1-1
Citation: M. James et S. Gardiner, TOUCHLINES AND GUIDELINES - THE LORD ADVOCATES RESPONSE TO SPORTSFIELD VIOLENCE, Criminal law review, 1997, pp. 41-45
Citation: P. Roberts, THE LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER ON PREVIOUS MISCONDUCT .1. ALL THE USUAL SUSPECTS - A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER NO 141, Criminal law review, 1997, pp. 75-92
Citation: J. Mcewan, THE LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER ON PREVIOUS MISCONDUCT .2. LAW COMMISSION DODGES THE NETTLES IN CONSULTATION PAPER NO 141, Criminal law review, 1997, pp. 93-104
Citation: P. Darbyshire, THE LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER ON PREVIOUS MISCONDUCT .3. PREVIOUS MISCONDUCT AND MAGISTRATES COURTS - SOME TALES FROM THE REAL-WORLD, Criminal law review, 1997, pp. 105-115