Citation: Mf. Stasson et Sd. Bradshaw, EXPLANATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL-GROUP PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES - WHAT SORT OF BONUS CAN BE GAINED THROUGH GROUP-INTERACTION, Small group research, 26(2), 1995, pp. 296-308
Citation: Bj. Broome et L. Fulbright, A MULTISTAGE INFLUENCE MODEL OF BARRIERS TO GROUP-PROBLEM SOLVING - APARTICIPANT-GENERATED AGENDA FOR SMALL-GROUP RESEARCH, Small group research, 26(1), 1995, pp. 25-55
Citation: C. Burningham et Ma. West, INDIVIDUAL CLIMATE, AND GROUP-INTERACTION PROCESSES AS PREDICTORS OF WORK TEAM INNOVATION, Small group research, 26(1), 1995, pp. 106-117
Citation: Cm. Anderson et Mm. Martin, THE EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION MOTIVES, INTERACTION INVOLVEMENT, AND LONELINESS ON SATISFACTION - A MODEL OF SMALL-GROUPS, Small group research, 26(1), 1995, pp. 118-137
Citation: Rh. Hoyle et Am. Crawford, USE OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL DATA TO INVESTIGATE GROUP PHENOMENA - ISSUES AND STRATEGIES, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 464-485
Citation: Rh. Hoyle et Am. Crawford, USE OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL DATA TO INVESTIGATE GROUP PHENOMENA - ISSUES AND STRATEGIES, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 464-485
Citation: Gm. Burlingame et al., ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE VERSUS BOOTSTRAP PROCEDURES FOR ANALYZING DEPENDENT OBSERVATIONS IN SMALL-GROUP RESEARCH, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 486-501
Citation: Gm. Burlingame et al., ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE VERSUS BOOTSTRAP PROCEDURES FOR ANALYZING DEPENDENT OBSERVATIONS IN SMALL-GROUP RESEARCH, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 486-501
Citation: A. Fuhriman et Gm. Burlingame, MEASURING SMALL-GROUP PROCESS - A METHODOLOGICAL APPLICATION OF CHAOSTHEORY, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 502-519
Citation: A. Fuhriman et Gm. Burlingame, MEASURING SMALL-GROUP PROCESS - A METHODOLOGICAL APPLICATION OF CHAOSTHEORY, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 502-519
Citation: Ry. Hirokawa, FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF GROUP DISCUSSION - EVEN GOOD NOTIONS HAVE THEIR PROBLEMS, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 542-550
Citation: Ry. Hirokawa, FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF GROUP DISCUSSION - EVEN GOOD NOTIONS HAVE THEIR PROBLEMS, Small group research, 25(4), 1994, pp. 542-550
Citation: Sm. Farmer et Cw. Hyatt, EFFECTS OF TASK LANGUAGE DEMANDS AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON COMPUTER-MEDIATED WORK GROUPS, Small group research, 25(3), 1994, pp. 331-366
Citation: Dr. Forsyth et Kn. Kelley, ATTRIBUTION IN GROUPS - ESTIMATIONS OF PERSONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO COLLECTIVE ENDEAVORS, Small group research, 25(3), 1994, pp. 367-383
Citation: J. Gastil, A METAANALYTIC REVIEW OF THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SATISFACTION OF DEMOCRATIC AND AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP, Small group research, 25(3), 1994, pp. 384-410