Citation: M. Studdertkennedy et M. Mody, AUDITORY TEMPORAL PERCEPTION DEFICITS IN THE READING-IMPAIRED - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(4), 1995, pp. 508-514
Citation: G. Mckoon et R. Ratcliff, CONCEPTUAL COMBINATIONS AND RELATIONAL CONTEXTS IN FREE ASSOCIATION AND IN PRIMING IN LEXICAL DECISION AND NAMING, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(4), 1995, pp. 527-533
Citation: Tl. Hubbard, ENVIRONMENTAL INVARIANTS IN THE REPRESENTATION OF MOTION - IMPLIED DYNAMICS AND REPRESENTATIONAL MOMENTUM, GRAVITY, FRICTION, AND CENTRIPETAL FORCE, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 322-338
Citation: Pl. Tenpenny, ABSTRACTIONIST VERSUS EPISODIC THEORIES OF REPETITION PRIMING AND WORD IDENTIFICATION, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 339-363
Citation: Dl. Chiappe et Cm. Macleod, NEGATIVE PRIMING IS NOT TASK BOUND - A CONSISTENT PATTERN ACROSS NAMING AND CATEGORIZATION TASKS, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 364-369
Citation: B. Hommel et Y. Lippa, S-R COMPATIBILITY EFFECTS DUE TO CONTEXT-DEPENDENT SPATIAL STIMULUS CODING, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 370-374
Citation: C. Chiarello et al., INITIAL RIGHT-HEMISPHERE ACTIVATION OF SUBORDINATE WORD MEANINGS IS NOT DUE TO HOMOTOPIC CALLOSAL INHIBITION, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 375-380
Citation: Ms. Weldon et Hl. Colston, DISSOCIATING THE GENERATION STAGE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY TESTS - INCIDENTAL PRODUCTION CAN DIFFER FROM STRATEGIC ACCESS, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 381-386
Citation: E. Tulving et N. Kroll, NOVELTY ASSESSMENT IN THE BRAIN AND LONG-TERM-MEMORY ENCODING, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 387-390
Citation: P. Koele et Mrm. Westenberg, A COMPENSATION INDEX FOR MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION STRATEGIES, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(3), 1995, pp. 398-402
Citation: Ch. Lu et Rw. Proctor, THE INFLUENCE OF IRRELEVANT LOCATION INFORMATION ON PERFORMANCE - A REVIEW OF THE SIMON AND SPATIAL STROOP EFFECTS, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(2), 1995, pp. 174-207
Citation: Fk. Mcsweeney et al., PROSPECTIVE FACTORS CONTRIBUTE LITTLE TO WITHIN-SESSION CHANGES IN RESPONDING, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2(2), 1995, pp. 234-238