Citation: C. Lacasse et Aa. Payne, Federal sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences: Do defendants bargain in the shadow of the judge?, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 245-269
Citation: Jm. Anderson et al., Measuring interjudge sentencing disparity: Before and after the federal sentencing guidelines, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 271-307
Citation: D. Kessler et Sd. Levitt, Using sentence enhancements to distinguish between deterrence and incapacitation, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 343-363
Citation: Dm. Kahan et Ea. Posner, Shaming white-collar criminals: A proposal for reform of the federal sentencing guidelines, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 365-391
Citation: Cr. Alexander et al., Regulating corporate criminal sanctions: Federal guidelines and the sentencing of public firms, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 393-422
Citation: Js. Parker et Ra. Atkins, Did the corporate criminal sentencing guidelines matter? Some preliminary empirical observations, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 423-453
Citation: I. Ehrlich et Zq. Liu, Sensitivity analyses of the deterrence hypothesis: Let's keep the econ in econometrics, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 455-487
Citation: P. Gompers et J. Lerner, Conflict of interest in the issuance of public securities: Evidence from venture capital, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 1-28
Citation: Aw. Ando, Waiting to be protected under the endangered species act: The political economy of regulatory delay, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 29-60
Authors:
Krouse, CG
Danger, KL
Cabolis, C
Carter, TD
Riddle, JM
Ryan, DJ
Citation: Cg. Krouse et al., The Bell System divestiture/deregulation and the efficiency of the operating companies, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 61-87
Citation: Ja. Risso, Advertising and competition in the ethical pharmaceutical industry: The case of antihypertensive drugs, J LAW ECON, 42(1), 1999, pp. 89-116