Citation: J. Krishnan et Pc. Schauer, The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 9-25
Citation: Me. Wright et Ra. Davidson, The effect of auditor attestation and tolerance for ambiguity on commercial lending decisions, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 67-81
Citation: Mb. Curtis et Re. Viator, An investigation of multidimensional knowledge structure and computer auditor performance, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 83-103
Citation: Rb. Dusenbury et al., The audit risk model: An empirical test for conditional dependencies amongassessed component risks, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 105-117
Citation: Wf. Messier et La. Austen, Inherent risk and control risk assessments: Evidence on the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 119-131
Citation: Jr. Cohen et Dm. Hanno, Auditors' consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 133-146
Citation: Em. Bamber et Rj. Ramsay, The effects of specialization in audit workpaper review on review efficiency and reviewers' confidence, AUDITING, 19(2), 2000, pp. 147-157
Citation: Km. Johnstone, Client-acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk,audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation, AUDITING, 19(1), 2000, pp. 1-25
Citation: Eb. Davis et al., The relation between consensus and accuracy in low-to-moderate accuracy tasks: An auditing example, AUDITING, 19(1), 2000, pp. 101-121
Citation: Pr. Gillett et Rp. Srivastava, Attribute sampling: A belief-function approach to statistical audit evidence, AUDITING, 19(1), 2000, pp. 145-155