AAAAAA
Results:
1-9
|
Results: 9
Authors:
HERTWIG R
Citation: R. Hertwig, PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS AND TH E QUESTION OF WHAT GOOD EXPERIMENTATION IS, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie, 45(1), 1998, pp. 2-19
Authors:
SEDLMEIER P
HERTWIG R
GIGERENZER G
Citation: P. Sedlmeier et al., ARE JUDGMENTS OF THE POSITIONAL FREQUENCIES OF LETTERS SYSTEMATICALLYBIASED DUE TO AVAILABILITY, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 24(3), 1998, pp. 754-770
Authors:
ORTMANN A
HERTWIG R
Citation: A. Ortmann et R. Hertwig, THE QUESTION REMAINS - IS DECEPTION ACCEPTABLE, The American psychologist, 53(7), 1998, pp. 806-807
Authors:
HERTWIG R
ORTMANN A
GIGERENZER G
Citation: R. Hertwig et al., RATIONALITY IN REASONING - THE PROBLEM OF DEDUCTIVE COMPETENCE - COMMENTARY, Cahiers de psychologie cognitive, 16(1-2), 1997, pp. 102-107
Authors:
HERTWIG R
GIGERENZER G
HOFFRAGE U
Citation: R. Hertwig et al., THE REITERATION EFFECT IN HINDSIGHT BIAS, Psychological review, 104(1), 1997, pp. 194-202
Authors:
ORTMANN A
HERTWIG R
Citation: A. Ortmann et R. Hertwig, IS DECEPTION ACCEPTABLE, The American psychologist, 52(7), 1997, pp. 746-747
Authors:
CHASE VM
HERTWIG R
Citation: Vm. Chase et R. Hertwig, HOW TO REVERSE PROBABILITY JUDGMENTS IN THE CONJUNCTION PROBLEM - THEDECISIVE ROLE OF RESPONSE-MODE, International journal of psychology, 31(3-4), 1996, pp. 1174-1174
Authors:
HERTWIG R
GIGERENZER G
Citation: R. Hertwig et G. Gigerenzer, THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY REVISITED - POLYSEMY, CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS, AND FREQUENCY JUDGMENTS, International journal of psychology, 31(3-4), 1996, pp. 1176-1176
Authors:
HOFFRAGE U
HERTWIG R
GIGERENZER G
Citation: U. Hoffrage et al., HINDSIGHT BIAS AS A RESULT OF CUE UPDATING, International journal of psychology, 31(3-4), 1996, pp. 4406-4406
Risultati:
1-9
|