Citation: A. Tziner et al., Relationships between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior, INT J SEL A, 9(3), 2001, pp. 226-239
Citation: Jc. Beaty et al., The relation between personality and contextual performance in "strong" versus "weak" situations, HUM PERFORM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 125-148
Citation: Ra. Barkley et al., Time perception and reproduction in young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, NEUROPSYCHL, 15(3), 2001, pp. 351-360
Citation: Kr. Murphy et al., Executive functioning and olfactory identification in young adults with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, NEUROPSYCHL, 15(2), 2001, pp. 211-220
Authors:
Campion, MA
Outtz, JL
Zedeck, S
Schmidt, FL
Kehoe, JF
Murphy, KR
Guion, RM
Citation: Ma. Campion et al., The controversy over score banding in personnel selection: Answers to 10 key questions, PERS PSYCH, 54(1), 2001, pp. 149-185
Authors:
Imboden, M
Murphy, KR
Rakhmilevich, AL
Neal, ZC
Xiang, R
Reisfeld, RA
Gillies, SD
Sondel, PM
Citation: M. Imboden et al., The level of MHC class I expression on murine adenocarcinoma can change the antitumor effector mechanism of immunocytokine therapy, CANCER RES, 61(4), 2001, pp. 1500-1507
Authors:
Murphy, KR
Eivindson, A
Pauksens, K
Stein, WJ
Tellier, G
Watts, R
Leophonte, P
Sharp, SJ
Loeschel, E
Citation: Kr. Murphy et al., Efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir for the treatment of influenza inpatients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, CLIN DRUG I, 20(5), 2000, pp. 337-349
Citation: A. Tziner et al., A comparison of three methods of performance appraisal with regard to goalproperties, goal perception, and ratee satisfaction, GROUP ORG M, 25(2), 2000, pp. 175-190
Citation: Kr. Murphy, Impact of assessments of validity generalization and situational specificity on the science and practice of personnel selection, INT J SEL A, 8(4), 2000, pp. 194-206
Authors:
Thornton, GC
Murphy, KR
Everest, TM
Hoffman, CC
Citation: Gc. Thornton et al., Higher cost, lower validity and higher utility: Comparing the utilities oftwo tests that differ in validity, costs and selectivity, INT J SEL A, 8(2), 2000, pp. 61-75
Citation: Kr. Murphy et R. De Shon, Interrater correlations do not estimate the reliability of job performanceratings, PERS PSYCH, 53(4), 2000, pp. 873-900
Citation: Kr. Murphy et R. De Shon, Progress in psychometrics: Can industrial and organizational psychology catch up?, PERS PSYCH, 53(4), 2000, pp. 913-924
Citation: D. Morin et al., The relationship between performance appraisal and indulgence in the evaluation process, RELAT IND, 54(4), 1999, pp. 694-726
Citation: Kr. Murphy et B. Myors, Testing the hypothesis that treatments have negligible effects: Minimum-effect tests in the general linear model, J APPL PSYC, 84(2), 1999, pp. 234-248