Citation: B. Hess et al., The efficacy of two improvement-over-chance effect sizes for two-group univariate comparisons under variance heterogeneity and nonnormality, EDUC PSYC M, 61(6), 2001, pp. 909-936
Citation: M. Faber et al., What are the confining field configurations of strong-coupling lattice gauge theory?, J HIGH EN P, 2000(6), 2000, pp. NIL_777-NIL_794
Citation: S. Olejnik et J. Algina, Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations, CONT ED PSY, 25(3), 2000, pp. 241-286
Citation: J. Algina et S. Olejnik, Determining sample size for accurate estimation of the squared multiple correlation coefficient, MULTIV BE R, 35(1), 2000, pp. 119-136
Citation: S. Olejnik et al., Using Wherry's adjusted R-2 and Mallow's C-p for model selection from all possible regressions, J EXP EDUC, 68(4), 2000, pp. 365-380
Authors:
Keselman, HJ
Huberty, CJ
Lix, LM
Olejnik, S
Cribbie, RA
Donahue, B
Kowalchuk, RK
Lowman, LL
Petoskey, MD
Keselman, JC
Levin, JR
Citation: Hj. Keselman et al., Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses, REV EDUC RE, 68(3), 1998, pp. 350-386