AAAAAA
Results:
1-25
|
Results: 25
Authors:
Heywang-Korunner, SH
Bick, U
Bradley, WG
Bone, B
Casselman, J
Coulthard, A
Fischer, U
Muller-Schimpfle, M
Oellinger, H
Patt, R
Teubner, J
Friedrich, M
Newstead, G
Holland, R
Schauer, A
Sickles, EA
Tabar, L
Waisman, J
Wernecke, KD
Citation: Sh. Heywang-korunner et al., International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI basedon 519 histopathologically correlated lesions, EUR RADIOL, 11(4), 2001, pp. 531-546
Authors:
Dee, KE
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ke. Dee et Ea. Sickles, Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: Comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently, AM J ROENTG, 176(3), 2001, pp. 729-733
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Pearson, KL
Frankel, SD
Leung, JWT
Citation: Ea. Sickles et al., What should be done first in the imaging workup of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view: Diagnostic mammography or sonography? Reply, AM J ROENTG, 176(2), 2001, pp. 545-546
Authors:
Burhenne, LJW
Smith, RA
Tabar, L
Dean, PB
Perry, N
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ljw. Burhenne et al., Mammographic screening: International perspective, SEM ROENTG, 36(3), 2001, pp. 187-194
Authors:
Burnside, ES
Sohlich, RE
Sickles, EA
Citation: Es. Burnside et al., Movement of a biopsy-site marker clip after completion of stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Case report, RADIOLOGY, 221(2), 2001, pp. 504-507
Authors:
Birdwell, RL
Ikeda, DM
O'Shaughnessy, KF
Sickles, EA
Citation: Rl. Birdwell et al., Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection, RADIOLOGY, 219(1), 2001, pp. 192-202
Authors:
Pisano, ED
Yaffe, MJ
Hemminger, BM
Hendrick, RE
Niklason, LT
Maidment, ADA
Kimme-Smith, CM
Feig, SA
Sickles, EA
Braeuning, MP
Citation: Ed. Pisano et al., Current status of full-field digital mammography, ACAD RADIOL, 7(4), 2000, pp. 266-280
Authors:
Leung, JWT
Sickles, EA
Citation: Jwt. Leung et Ea. Sickles, Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: Assessment ofneed for recall imaging, AM J ROENTG, 175(1), 2000, pp. 23-29
Authors:
Kinkel, K
Helbich, TH
Esserman, LJ
Barclay, J
Schwerin, EH
Sickles, EA
Hylton, NM
Citation: K. Kinkel et al., Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: Diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability, AM J ROENTG, 175(1), 2000, pp. 35-43
Authors:
Hunt, KA
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ka. Hunt et Ea. Sickles, Effect of obesity on screening mammography: Outcomes analysis of 88,346 consecutive examinations, AM J ROENTG, 174(5), 2000, pp. 1251-1255
Authors:
Pearson, KL
Sickles, EA
Frankel, SD
Leung, JWT
Citation: Kl. Pearson et al., Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view, AM J ROENTG, 174(3), 2000, pp. 745-752
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge, LANCET, 356(9242), 2000, pp. 1622-1623
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Follow-up of probably benign breast lesions - Response, RADIOLOGY, 217(1), 2000, pp. 304-305
Authors:
Burhenne, LJW
Wood, SA
D'Orsi, CJ
Feig, SA
Kopans, DB
O'Shaughnessy, KF
Sickles, EA
Tabar, L
Vyborny, CJ
Castellino, RA
Citation: Ljw. Burhenne et al., Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography, RADIOLOGY, 215(2), 2000, pp. 554-562
Authors:
Kan, L
Olivotto, IA
Burhenne, LJW
Sickles, EA
Coldman, AJ
Citation: L. Kan et al., Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assessreading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program, RADIOLOGY, 215(2), 2000, pp. 563-567
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Breast imaging: From 1965 to the present, RADIOLOGY, 215(1), 2000, pp. 1-16
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Successful methods to reduce false-positive mammography interpretations, RAD CLIN NA, 38(4), 2000, pp. 693
Authors:
Bidgood, WD
D'Orsi, CJ
Greenes, RA
Huang, HK
Jost, RG
Langlotz, CP
Schilling, RB
Sickles, EA
Staab, EV
Citation: Wd. Bidgood et al., Report of the Joint Working Group on Telemammography/Teleradiology and Information Management - March 15-17, 1999 Washington, DC - Abstracts, ACAD RADIOL, 6, 1999, pp. S303-S324
Authors:
Bassett, LW
Cardenosa, G
D'Orsi, CJ
Dempsey, PJ
Dershaw, DD
Destouet, JM
Evans, WP
Feig, SA
Hendrick, RE
Jackson, VP
Kopans, DB
Linver, MN
Mendelson, EB
Monsees, B
Racenstein, MJ
Sickles, EA
Stelling, C
Warren, L
Citation: Lw. Bassett et al., Risk of risk-based mammography screening, ages 40 to 49, J CL ONCOL, 17(2), 1999, pp. 735-737
Authors:
Hunt, KA
Rosen, EL
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ka. Hunt et al., Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: A review of 24,211 examinations, AM J ROENTG, 173(2), 1999, pp. 285-289
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?, RADIOLOGY, 213(1), 1999, pp. 11-14
Authors:
Sickles, EA
Citation: Ea. Sickles, Six-month follow-up: An alternative view - Commentary on Dr Rubin's viewpoint, RADIOLOGY, 213(1), 1999, pp. 19-20
Authors:
Kerlikowske, K
Grady, D
Barclay, J
Frankel, SD
Ominsky, SH
Sickles, EA
Ernster, V
Citation: K. Kerlikowske et al., Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the AmericanCollege of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, J NAT CANC, 90(23), 1998, pp. 1801-1809
Authors:
Feig, SA
Kopans, DB
Sickles, EA
Jackson, VP
Monsees, B
Citation: Sa. Feig et al., Rationale for annual screening mammography for women ages 40-49 years, BREAST IMAGING, 1998, pp. 13-21
Authors:
Rosen, EL
Frankel, SD
Sickles, EA
Citation: El. Rosen et al., Screening mammography, BREAST CARE, 1998, pp. 52-68
Risultati:
1-25
|